Most of Great Britain supported this war, so his words about it mark him as one who was willing to go against the tide, think through what was happening, and form his own opinions about this war. I shot him dead because-- Because he was my foe, Just so: my foe of course he was; That's clear enough; although He thought he'd 'list, perhaps, Off-hand like--just as I-- Was out of work--had sold his traps-- No other reason why. While it has always been customary for uneducated men to join the army, the narrator doesn't seem to take pride in his country or duty. Maybe he enlisted in the army because he was out of work. No-one spoke of the soldier again because they were too busy trying to win at the war to remember anyone, especially a generic soldier, and also if they did remember they would be killed for cowardice so no-one could be remembered quite as much as they should have been. Thomas Hardy wrote poems such as The Man He Killed as a way to express his feelings about the Boer wars which were going on during his time. In war and war exploits, politics and politicking, we don't care about the life, security and livlihood of others as human beings but just do have our own axe to grind.
Analysis 2 The poem is spoken in first person, using a young soldier as the speaker. It forces the reader to examine the brutality and inhumanity of war, and to ponder how humans are often victims of sheer circumstance and fate In a world filled with merciless crimes, it is not rare to hear of people losing their humanity. On the whole, the poem is acutely ironic. Autoplay next video Had he and I but met By some old ancient inn, We should have set us down to wet Right many a nipperkin! The last line obliquely impraginates the real purpose of killing that man -'to help half a crown'. Judiciously speaking, if there is weaker defence, fragile boundry, or simple humanistic outlook towards life, no house nor any polity can exist on this globe.
He was apprenticed to be an architect, but after a short stint at architecture, he turned his attention to writing. Would the enemy soldier have been the type he would have easily loaned money to? It is easy to appreciate this poem and to identify with the soldier and his feelings, sympathizing with his predicament and sensing that he regrets having had to kill his enemy. This particular poem makes war very personal, and causes the reader to think about war in terms of one man killing another even though neither man hated the other. He also questions our sense of morality when faced with crucial question of life and death. In fact, it only seems to be mentioned in passing, as if only to make the reader understand the situation. While there are few details in this short poem, Hardy includes enough information for the reader to understand his perspective on man's inhumanity toward his fellow man. The language is very straightforward and easy to comprehend with the exception of two or three words.
And they lived happily ever after. All content submitted here are by contributors. But ranged as infantry, And staring face to face, I shot at him as he at me, And killed him in his place. The informal diction used by Hardy adds to the general meaning and impact of the poem. We shoot down the people who might have been our kins and whom we would have served, shared, hosted in some inn if otherwise not in war. Hardy had always been centered on the rural life of England and Victorian hypocrisy. The speaker then goes on to describe how he killed the guy and tries to explain why.
He also had a keen interest in history, and studied many of the wars that had happened much before his time. Critical Analysis of The Man he Killed The poem is a direct attack on the glorification of war. However, the rhyme and rhythm that he uses are light and musical, giving the poem a feeling of irony that makes the dark images all the more powerful. The narrator's subtle signs of remorse indicate that he is troubled by the calculated killing of war; in fact, he compares himself to his enemy, claiming that they are probably in the same situation and joined the army for similar reasons. Rather, the men's duties to their separate armies lead them to make decisions that include taking another's life. Setting and Mood of The Man He Killed The setting of the poem is probably a bar or inn, where the speaker is relaying the event to his friends. Conclusion In final stanza he questions the motives of war.
Yes; quaint and curious war is! The experiences that Hardy had throughout his life did not give him a very optimistic view of mankind. Many of Hardy's poems, including this one, reflect Hardy's belief in meliorism. It means that he had sold all his belongings for money. The subject of The Man He Killed however, is clearly not nursery rhyme material and the rhyme and rhythm paired with the ideas presented create a sense of irony. War is a man-made creation, but it is not man's instinct to murder others. The poet wants to emphasize the established routine of British camaraderie. Instead of metaphors and similes, the poem focuses on a 'what if' type of situation.
He himself enlisted because he knew not what else to do. Armies are promoted as united citizens who are fighting for a cause; however, Hardy illustrates that this isn't true. The poem is written in a conversational tone, with speech marks included, making us feel that the soldier is addressing us personally in an informal way, and pleading with us to understand his action in killing his enemy. It isn't easy to kill another man, even if it is one's supposed duty. One eigth of a sovereign or £0. A significant influence on later poets including Frost, Auden, Dylan Thomas, and Philip Larkin , his influence has increased during the course of the century, offering an alternative—more down-to-earth, less rhetorical—to the more mystical and aristocratic precedent of Yeats.
This brings us to the question of the limit of wars. He admits his guilt yet at the same time subverts it by blaming it on war. In my view, it describes my own inability to understand how violence can be such a common event among the supposed sentient beings of the human race. Even so, he grasps at excuses by pauses dashes and repeating words to assuage his guilt of having killed a man, who perhaps could have been a friend. The title in Flanders field talks about the field in Belgium where the background for this poem is set. He keeps the pace upbeat so as not to give in to the guilt, but he also uses dry humour to represent the ridiculous workings of war.