They assume a certain gullibility in their audience. But be careful of sites such as Wikipedia that allow multiple users to edit. Cornell link connects to the full-text of articles in places like Google Scholar or databases that only have article abstracts. As the dry season progresses, elephants become increasingly dependent on artificial human-made water sources, such as bore holes. Step 2: Review the search results.
Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces are reliable for attributed statements as to the opinion of the author, but are rarely reliable for statements of fact. Has good links in history section. However, some scholarly material may be outdated, in competition with alternate theories, or controversial within the relevant field. Humanities Project Muse A database of over 200 non-profit publishers. Finding books, articles, and other materials How do I find it? I remember when I first started teaching at Longwood 20 years ago and I saw a student sitting in the hallway reading something before class.
It has lots of cool information about lots of cool topics. Examples include style guidelines, writing instruction, editing tutorials and grammar guidelines. Other site features include a blog and a community forum. It provides a great deal of relevant information in a very fast manner, but that information is not necessarily credible. For that reason self-published media—whether books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, personal pages on social networking sites, Internet forum postings, or tweets—are largely not acceptable. TeacherServe consists of a series of instructional guides on important topics in the humanities on the secondary level. Proper sourcing always depends on context; common sense and editorial judgment are an indispensable part of the process.
Next I went to google and did an advanced search and limited the domain name to. High-quality journalism involves only relying on sources that can provide accurate and trustworthy information. Reviewers check to make sure that the methods and statistical tests employed in the research are appropriate and that the conclusions of the study are justified given the data presented in the study. You may also want to review other studies on adolescent girls to see how the studies were conducted and the data interpreted. Somewhat less expected was the elephants' fondness to walk close to roads. If you create a free account with Google Books, you get complete access to book excerpts, reviews, maps and other useful tools. Thousands of people believed his words and fact, but there was no credibility.
Because peer review is of such importance in establishing the reliability of the information, knowing whether a source is reviewed and who has done the reviewing are important aspects to consider when evaluating a source. Look for citations of recent studies, perhaps with footnotes and see if there are primary quotes from other relevant experts in the field. But we found the complete opposite -- elephants have a stronger preference for locations where forage conditions have been better for many years, over the forage availability they see around them at the moment. ThinkFree provides storage and a workspace for either personal or collaborative projects. An annotated guide to the best education-related web sites. Keep reading to find out! Intended audience: What type of audience is the author addressing? Finding Credible Sources Online The dreaded research paper can leave many wondering where to go for information. Another aspect to consider is the potential for conflict of interest between the report and the source of support or the publisher of the material.
It is a great resource for science writers and researchers. The site looks almost exactly like Wikipedia, but there is a difference between the two: Scholarpedia can be cited in research papers. Is the book considered a valuable contribution to the field? Conversions take just a few seconds and finished documents come out perfect every time. Some fields such as the humanities prefer their students use books for sources rather than websites, since books typically contain more detailed information and perhaps more in-depth thinking than websites do. Microsoft has a competitor to Google Scholar that is very similar, Microsoft Academic Search. These are potential search terms.
Run by a small educational publishing company, this website provides free online materials for major history curriculum subjects. Questionable sources are generally unsuitable for citing contentious claims about third parties, which includes claims against institutions, persons living or dead, as well as more ill-defined entities. They have been vetted by the scholarly community; most are available via interlibrary loan. New calculators are constantly being added. Multiple printings or editions may indicate that the work has become a standard source in the area and is reliable.
Later editions indicate a source has been revised and updated. It is a search tool that finds scholarly articles—academic journals, patents, theses, court proceedings, and more. An extensive and well-organized guide to using the Web for general academic ends. We also encourage you to read through our series on. Visitors can sign up for a free monthly e-mail newsletter covering web reviews and using technology in the history classroom.
Without this replication of , the and have not fulfilled all of the requirements of. Before the results of scientific research are published in a peer-reviewed journal, persons trained and active in the same area of research review the manuscript. The intermediate-level course is developed for. Users can take and store notes, create calendars, manage contacts and upload various forms of media. Other researchers must be able to perform exactly the same , under the same conditions and generate the same results.