Application for recalling the ex parte order was allowed and the ex parte order was accordingly recalled and the revisional application was restored to file. Court had passed the decree because you were absent in court when the case called for hearing. Recall of Ex parte Order: It is also true that there is no express provision in the Civil Procedure Code for recalling the order under section 115, C. This fee shall be added to the uniform filing fee for actions filed under this chapter. Lastly, if there be specific provision in the Code, which would meet the necessities of the case, inherent powers cannot be invoked. These are not exhaustive but merely illustrative. Courts are not to act upon the principle that every procedure is to be taken as prohibited unless it is expressly provided for by the Code, but on the converse principle that every procedure is to be understood as permissible till it is shown to be prohibited by the law.
Hence every judgment consists of facts, evidence, findings etc. Section 151 is the reservoir of that power where under inherent powers can be exercised by the court to make such order as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court. Decree is the operating part of the judgment and which is in harmony with the judgment. Since no party can suffer for mis-demeanour or laches of his counsel, as laid down in the decision reported in A. Where a wrong order cannot be corrected under S. Use to get detailed state and local rules and requirements. In this connection reference may be made to the case of Narsingh, Das v.
The Code has served the country in more ways than anticipated by its makers. The same principle will apply in respect of the order passed by the same court regarding stay where decree for delivery of the possession is clearly executed. Maharaj Singh, the Supreme Court held that the Rent Control Officer shall be deemed to be a civil court within the meaning of Ss. Recalling of order of settlement: Simply because public notice of claim was not served in affected locality, an order of settlement cannot be set aside, as omission to serve notice is an ordinary irregularity and no violation of any mandatory provision. The case was adjourned to 8. The mere fact that an ex-parte decree was obtained, will not itself attract the provision of S. Maharaj Singh, the Supreme Court held that the Rent Control Officer shall be deemed to be a civil court within the meaning of Ss.
Nandramdas, it was observed that though the Act does not give any power of dismissal, it is axiomatic that no court or tribunal is supposed to continue a proceeding before it when the party who has moved it has not appeared nor cared to remain present. Limitations: The limitations of the inherent power may be noted, In the first place, the court has no inherent power to do what is prohibited by the Code so as to defeat a statutory provision of the law of the land. The State of Uttar Pradesh, that the inherent powers of the court are in addition to the powers specifically conferred on the court by the Code. The court has power to act under S. It is the fundamental principle that a court of justice is under a duty to repair the injury done to a party by its act.
There is no reason why the civil court cannot in that situation to further the object of Ss. D To a person by order of the court, which may be granted ex parte, on a showing of good cause. Where the order of remand merely sets aside the decree of the trial court and does not itself decide any of the points raised for determination and does not determine the rights of the parties with regard to any of the matters in controversy in the suit, it cannot amount to a decree and must be treated as an order. Where the averments in the application did not make out a case as to how the exercise of the inherent power of the court was necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of the court and the applicant did not come to the court with clean hands and had suppressed the facts and the case involved complexity of facts and the justice of the claim was adverse to the applicant, it was held that there was no case for the exercise of inherent powers in favour of the applicant. The court is not to invoke its inherent powers under S. Ex-parte judgment was passed by Addl.
For detailed requirements on filing ex parte motions in a specific California Superior Court, please see the SmartRules for the court where your action is pending. In Bhanu Kumar Jain v. It gives power to the court to pass such orders as it thinks fit. An ex parte application presented without notice must be accompanied by a declaration that, for reasons specified, the applicant should not be required to inform the opposing party. Under the inherent power of courts recognised by S. The mere fact that the decree of the trial court has been set aside would not thus make the order of remand a decree and appealable as such.
Allahabad Bank Ltd: The exercise of such inherent power can only be invoked where the court is satisfied that the provisions of the Code are not sufficient to meet the exigencies of the case: Justice Asutosh Mookerjee in the case of Ghuznavi v. It was not possible for the legislature to cover each and every case which may come up before a court for consideration and it is for that purpose to enable the court to cover cases that this enabling provision was put in the Code. Except as otherwise specifically provided by these rules, applications for ex parte orders or provisional remedies shall be presented as follows: Civil applications involving injunctive relief, extraordinary provisional remedies writs of attachment , emergency relief and appointment of receivers and any matters subject to the civil delay reduction program shall be presented to the Civil Judge assigned to the action at the time of filing. An order of remand under S. Admission to educational institutions should not be granted by interim orders at any rate, not without fully hearing the respondents.